gnollbard:
“ paradisemantis:
“ gnollbard:
“ paradisemantis:
“ gnollbard:
“ paradisemantis:
“ feels-by-the-foot:
“ make–it–gayer:
“‼️‼️‼️
”
Hooooly shit, what a stupid comparison
”
No? They have the same name, evolving doesn’t change a Pokemon’s name....

gnollbard:

paradisemantis:

gnollbard:

paradisemantis:

gnollbard:

paradisemantis:

feels-by-the-foot:

make–it–gayer:

‼️‼️‼️

Hooooly shit, what a stupid comparison

No? They have the same name, evolving doesn’t change a Pokemon’s name. This is the kind of fake geek crap that needs to stop, don’t use shit you don’t understand to make your political points.

That uh. That is plainly false. When your un-nicknamed Totodile evolves Into a Crocanaw, it’s name goes from Totadile to Crocanaw. Same from Crocanaw to Feraligatr.

That is plainly true, no idea why you’d even try this. That’s not it’s name, that’s it’s species. If you actually name it then it keeps the name.

But if you don’t nickname it, the -name- in the -name slot- is it’s species, which changes.

The absence of a name is not a name

It’s not the absence of a name. If it were, then there would he nothing in the name slot. As well, if it weren’t a name, then when you nickname them, it wouldn’t be “Giving them a nickname” it would be “Giving them a name” as Nickname means an alternative name. If you nickname them, then there must be a standard name, which defaults to their species. I realize you’re likely just being pedantic now, but… Legit, it’s silly.

Also, as @perpetualundead said, you can change Pokemon’s nicknames at the name rater and noooooooobody gives a shit. (Assuming you didn’t get the ‘mon in a trade.)

Wait. First off the tweet is obviously referring to a pokemons species name. You don’t call a Growlithe an Arcanine (Unless you’re a misinformed voice actor to a certain police woman) but there species change so their name changes. Alright I’m with you this far. So “ They have the same name, evolving doesn’t change a Pokemon’s name. “ is false. If anything that first post suggest that you can still call Johnny Sue “Johnny” even after they change their “species”. That’s totally against what the tweet is suggesting. You should take time to say “Mary Sue” instead of “Johnny Sue”. Their “previous stage.”

So it’s clear he’s talking about their species, not their nickname. You’re not even arguing about the right thing, mantis.


Also evolving into a different gender implies the previous gender was inferior and that’s just sexist if you make that comparison. It’s the same thing as that tweet about how the economy should be like Mario Kart. It seems like a good idea at first but when you really think about it, it’s just not a good comparison.

Posted 11 months ago | 82,772 notes | via | ©





  1. juggsica4bitchysyr reblogged this from rainbow-dicc
  2. necromancer53 reblogged this from rainbow-dicc
  3. pancakes40 reblogged this from rainbow-dicc
  4. embarrassedfella reblogged this from rainbow-dicc
  5. xheirjordanx reblogged this from rainbow-dicc
  6. rainbow-dicc reblogged this from rainb0w-dicc
  7. fionagrace24 reblogged this from collegiate-confession
  8. strrsinmy-eyes reblogged this from collegiate-confession
  9. allineedis-bones reblogged this from twitterlols
  10. mickeymaus reblogged this from suuhlest
  11. thevelvetisred reblogged this from cartoonsandkpop
  12. yikes-bust-a-nut reblogged this from the-loveliest-lies
  13. the-loveliest-lies reblogged this from cartoonsandkpop
  14. cartoonsandkpop reblogged this from anythingbutregular
  15. viciouspumpkinwolf reblogged this from feelinhaughthaughthaught
  16. severelymysticshark reblogged this from feelinhaughthaughthaught
  17. feelinhaughthaughthaught reblogged this from make--it--gayer
  18. bbyhellhound reblogged this from tamper
  19. yunakozue reblogged this from crystallizedtwilight
  20. ea5t reblogged this from collegiate-confession
  21. make--it--gayer posted this

Via gnollbard
Source: make--it--gayer





© | Theme SPACING, DESIGNED BY: MISS-YANI | POWERED BY: TUMBLR